Talk:History of Lithuanian Mappers/@comment-26045265-20151031221833/@comment-26435797-20161004103738

Part 1

1. I never said the city of Wilno still is Polish, it was Polish but then the Soviets invaded and deported a lot of the Poles living there, hence the reason there isn't that many poles there in present day.

2. Ok, so the city was first mentioned in 1323, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was formed in 1569 by the treaty of lublin. It wasn't Lithuanian for 913 years, it was only Lithuanian for 246 years, ok. It was Polish for 226 years. Add the 17 years that Poland annexed it after WW1 = 243 years. Ok, so thats pretty fair, only a 2 year difference.

2a. So what if the Annexation was called illegal? Thats like saying Crimea is populated by Ukranians because the annexation was illegal.

3. The majority of Lithuanias had already converted to Orthodox due to the Teutonic Order Crusades. The Poles did build Catholic churches but the Lithuanians weren't forced to go there and were aloud to speak their language.

4. Depolonisation Of Lithuania? Sorry but i don't know what your talking about. The Poles living there celebrate their heritage and aren't becoming Lithuania, i would like it if you linked a source.

PART 2

1. "Polonised Lithuanias" So? They are still POLES. Using that logic, around 20,000 years ago Slavic and Germanic tribes use to interbreed a lot, that means alot of Germans are Germanised poles and a lot of Poles are Polonised Germans right? Wrong!

2. Ok, somehow im a nationalist because i said that a place is populated by Polish people lol.

4.  I don't want a greater Poland, i never said that, all i said is that there is a Polish minority there. The reason that Wilno was not given to Poland after ww2 at the Yalta conference is because the Soviets expelled the Poles which where living there.

5. Wilno Region is Polski hahaha Nazi nationalist fascist free the minorties, Wilno Sudeneteland conference PLOX NATO AND EU.