Talk:Mapper rankings/@comment-5590986-20130823190713/@comment-6138112-20130823203708

Remember, YouTube and this wiki are very differant. Heck, we even act differently on YouTube.

The point is, is that somebody may have gotten subscribers from something that isn't a regular series (ie. Mapping), and may get a headstart from everybody alse. In other words, if a new mapper already has 1000 subscribers, does that automatically make him an influential mapper? No, it doesn't. My method is basically how commited your subscribers are to your mapping, or just regular work.

We could have a seperate hierarchy, but on YouTube, based on Subscribers. It would be more interesting considering how Youtube has all the Mappers (Almost). But that sounds contradictory... hmm...