Thread:Batran99/@comment-26889426-20160115225739/@comment-5590986-20160116004421

did you even learn from human history that electing people are more based off of Populism instead of electing people who are co-operative? Even if you elect various people into the system based on their rationality, whos to say that they won't conflict with other admins?

Secondly, what advice is there? There is absolutely no advice that people say that benefits, most people who said the advice has ZERO or FEWER experience in adminship. We look for choosing people off of quality, co-operative, efficient, etc. and not electing people because they have thousands of subs and everyone likes them (like NickHD, no offense).

If Disturbed and others have the last laugh (and does not threaten) then he wins then there must be something wrong with the advice.

You keep saying that this is not a country/nationstate/government to me, but you keep calling for elections