Thread:EoGuy99/@comment-26044830-20181016070935

Rainforest is also used in Wikipedia a lot. Again if you were to correct on Wikipedia by replacing all articles mentioning this into 'rain forest', would you even do it? There might be people on Wikipedia who want to revert it. The word 'rain forest' is technically correct but again using it goes off in my opinion. In Wikipedia, the article Brazil has only one mention of 'rain forest' but five mentions of 'rainforest'.

That's why I felt like reverting it. The wording in my opinion of using 'rain forest' is off and sounds erroneous. Sure, you don't use 'moistforest' or 'wetforest' if you ever want to mention it but today people interchangeably use 'rainforest' or 'rain forest' which makes correcting sound redundant as to color for colour. 'Rain forest' technically correct but I don't wish to see it here. 