Talk:June 2015/@comment-26951937-20150606202314/@comment-25802715-20150608153322

I'm sorry? But you're the one who started complaining. The internet is public, expect these things to happen. In addition, it's greatful to have one warning, too bad people tend to ignore warnings, similar to what happened just now. That's when a ban is needed. Pez can always just ban without a warning at all. How would it feel? If one warning doesn't remind people of the rules, then that's when a ban is needed. There is no need for 3 warnings.

You still continued the discussion after the ban was lifted? Oh jeez, I thought you were "smarter" (because you call others "stupid")

As a side note, if Nick actually continued after 3 warnings, the ban could actaully be longer. So what would you prefer?