Thread:Batran99/@comment-25309165-20141217131456/@comment-24458893-20150104171717

TheGamingDutchmen wrote: GanDaiMe11 wrote: TheGamingDutchmen wrote: Hey Batran! There's an problem. Everyone who shared there age and was under the age of 13, is banned. Could you please think about unbanning them? Oh yeah, Ethan is'nt banned, and he is 12. (racism).

-TheGamingDutchmen I don't really see a problem here, I mean the old mappers aren't really that bad in terms of making the wiki better, but the new mappers who are under 13, tend to be annoying, make fights all the time, with no valid reason. I don't think this is a bad thing, but they should unban those who actually are contributing to the wiki in a way. I really didn't see any new mappers do anything to help the wiki, expand or grow, they've just been making useless skirmishes, which end in "unease" friendship. "The new mappers who are under 13, tend to be annoying, make fights all the time, with no valid reason" I agree with you, but still, banning *certain* people under the age of 13 is just... How to call it... Well, you get my point.

And unbanning "those who actually are contributing to the wiki in a way" means Trio and Arcy should be unbanned too, because i think making wars is "contributing" too?

"I really didn't see any new mappers do anything to help the wiki" What is "new" for you? I think many useless wars occured just after Trio showed up. Later even more people started to make arguments, now some think it's funny and declare 'wars' that won't last even 5 minutes. Of course they must have their own page and be added to mapperdonian timeline, like we don't have enough spam on the wikia. A lot of alts are made and nobody knows if a certain person is a mapper (or not...).