Thread:LoveSeal990/@comment-34481284-20180517125456/@comment-32606476-20180518201647

LukaGaming wrote: Alright, I'll be the rational one here.


 * 1) First of all, no one ever host two consecutive summits in the span of just over a month. No one, ever.
 * 2) Sadly I agree that the first GONK summit logo was bad. (no, really, no bias here, I can't even tell whatever the heck was drawn on BF's flag)
 * 3) Alliance name trying to distinguish between "nation" and "kingdom" when a "kingdom" is a "nations". I didn't notice this until just now, when I realised that the acronym was wonky (and hilarious).
 * 4) "This summit has been made to talk about the inclusion of Secondary Nations into the alliance, and how that will be done." This was the reason UKBP told why the second summit would be held, despite my points on article 1. Honestly, if that's the only problem (because you do not include anything else), there's really no need to hold a proper summit for it. You don't host a summit to discuss one problem.

1. It was not my decision.

2. I tried copying it to the original logo (which was sh*tty). I hate when some f*cking person has to criticize me about it. I try so hard and people think that their f*cking b*tchy work is better. You guys are f*cking horrorble to think that. Everyone tries you know. That was a ship drawn on the logo (which was on the original).

3. Not my descision either. It was a reference to the GONK droids in Star Wars (as said by Dantomkian.)

4. Not my descision