Talk:A World of War: World II (Map Game)/@comment-26031225-20160410170226

So I was thinking abour what Soaring said earlier and I think limiting alliances would be a good idea. Let me explain, if we get two big alliances with a lot of countries, chances for growing and expanding would be extremly limited because no one would attack a member of the other alliance because noone ever starts WW3 in these scenarios. So, if we limited the member countries of an alliance to, let's say 3 or 5, we could allow more alliances to eixst rather than having 2 massive blocs and players would have more chances of expanding because many nations wouldn't be in a massive alliance.

(An example of this is; I want to take over the Caucasus but I can't because NATO, and others like Albania and Croatia want to expand in the Balkans but they can't because SP, limiting the game to a cold war where countries are not able to expand because they can't attack the other alliance would end up making the game boring)