Thread:Batran99/@comment-27646514-20160129165559/@comment-26047466-20160202163457

TMCM wrote:

Batran99 wrote:

TheBlueCube wrote: Flaming Spaghetti Monster wrote: BlueCube, this is not a debate about who has dealt more damage to who, the thing is, that Trio has broken the Terms of Use multiple times and we can't leave him get away with those things, he has to serve his ban. But we have harrased him much more than he has harrased us. Think about it. If you were Trio, and you got banned for harrasing people and creatinng alts, you would be sad to see everyone make fun of you even after you made up. It would be a sad life. Who cares if he has broken the rules, we have too. Insulting. He have broken the rules dozens of times, it doesn't matter if he made up and we treat him nicer, he have to serve his time. Normally im that guy that gives people too many chances (like 8-20 chances at most), but Trio is the first person who surpassed my leinancy i think trio is alot nicer now, He had a hard time at his old school and he was Still Recovering when he made His first account Now wiki wars and Factions are banned He wouldnt beable to declare war i believe he should be Unbanned in a month and a week but under Supervision. He made 10 ALTS And spammed the chat with them. Trio will not, and cannot be unbanned, he has to serve his ban, and it's a long one, he asked for it? Yes, yes he did, i don't care if he did not know what he was doing but spamming 10 alts saying things such as " trio killed batran99 " seems like he's the same person that more than one year ago, no.