Thread:Pezminer12/@comment-26230157-20150717141332/@comment-25802715-20150717225934

Honestly, we should just remove the "alt" reason.

Why?

First of all, we can't be 100% sure if it is an alt at all. So a new user who joins the WIkia and is similar to someone else is considered an alt? And in the end, we didn't ban because they were an alt. We ban because we SAW a violation in the RULES. The violation should be in the reason, the alt reason is invalid.

In this case, I agree with CroMapper for the reasoning. However the ban remains if Pez has the solid evidence.

(now there's a difference between an obvious alt such as Opret1, Opret2, Opret3 .etc, but during the recent events, it was too hard to tell if one was an alt or not)