Talk:Aequalitas et Aequitas (Map Game)/@comment-26047466-20170227201441/@comment-26044830-20170228083202

if it is the same, then it wouldn't make sense since the same tech level could mean a population boom (health technology and methods are likely to be the same as 2017 at a slow length so it means theres a chance that the baby boomers would still be able to produce more without a plan especially in developing areas) over the 21st century to say 9.5 billion unless some sort of famine, a 2 child policy campaign, plague or conflict (i.e. World War and proxy wars kill more people than OTL) then its reduced to 7.4 billion which makes sense, plus by 2050 it would be roughly 9 billion in OTL

tl,dms;sdr (too long, didn't make sense; so didn't read): It's the year 2047 and the population should be a lot more than 7 billion but rather 9.5 billion unless wars and policies set by government reduce it