User blog comment:VeryIrrelevant/Blog 1: Wiki Impressions/@comment-25802715-20160528215851

Spot on. Forum Moderator. Because I've been a forum moderator on more than one community. Now you can see where my seriousness comes from (I have shown people this is true).

After I banned you, I asked again if anyone disagreed. Freaker-San stated that people should have the free speech; however, as Freaker-San did not see the whole situation, this is a different case.

From my past experience here, people like EvergeenMapping have argued with me here stating that I am abusing my 'Chat Moderator' powers and acting superior over others. And then adding some political arguments like calling this wikia a specific political ideology. In these arguments, some people had supported with EvergeenMapping and it became a big argument over one another. At the end, we go our separate ways.

You must be wondering why I mentioned this. Well to tell you, in these arguments there are people who sided with him with a counter-argument to the reason for the ban. Be glad that we allow people to question our actions only to a certain extent unlike the forums. Here's the catch, how come when I banned you, there's like no one disagreeing with it. In which I find it very strange because that is rare to see when other people's opinions come into play. Even when I banned someone who is CLEARLY spamming, there are still people WHO DISAGREE. And when I banned you twice already, I still don't get much disagreements after asking for one (I said much because of Freaker-San). So people must have a reason why they chose not to disagree.

Well in here http://thefutureofeuropes.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:266477

it seems people already have added reasons why you deserved such a ban. Specifically FSM's comment. Now I wasn't there to witness this (though I did see your argument with Vankata), this wasn't the only thing that was pointed at you.

Now let's get to the reason why I banned you for two weeks. Well I added more because of your previous ban which wasn't too long ago. If I kicked you for a reason, you deserved it as you are responsible for your actions. What is absurd is that you go tell me that it is a Youtuber's name after you had 4 minutes to say that. Then demanded an apology? Despite you tabbing away, if you're someone who doesn't know what YouTube is and someone just blindly type "Nuke Norway", what is the meaning of that? What is the literal meaning of that? If you answer the literal meaning of that, it would mean nuking Norway. That crosses the line as we have banned users like Stockholm for typing those type of messages. I kicked you because I was like, you know what, first time, fine. But then demanding an apology from me and making up some excuse, that's simply absurd. I can just go type something very inappropriate and state it's a reference to something. Then people can bypass a punishment? Unfortunately, no. And we have also made it clear about our policy with ignorance and jokes (If you read it, you would know).

Now according to your Pastebin, I noticed that you cropped out the previous messages too. People were discussing about nukes and I happen to kick JMathias for saying "Nuke Argentina" after banning you. So to tell me you're referencing a YouTuber is unlikely as the discussion earlier was about nukes. If you had wrote it is a YouTuber name, that would be a different case. I would have kicked JMathias once I discovered what he said. Unfortunately, you were responsible for typing that as you did not add the actual meaning behind it.

First offense would have been a 3 days ban. Previous offense made it 5 days. Demanding an apology from me while trying to use that YouTuber as an excuse for your actions made it 2 weeks.

I am confident to say this. If Batran feels your ban time should be reduced, then he can reduce it. If batran feels I should be demoted, then he can demote me.