Talk:A Bad Past (Map Game)/@comment-26047466-20170428023329/@comment-5590986-20170428163422

Well having a couple places above in tech isn't everything.

But if it's not in power ranking then it should be the admins doing it. Tech rank doesn't really exist in this and it would be more work to make it up during the game (and provide more complicated work).

So if it is not included in power ranking, then add it. But it is ultimately up to the admins.

And I know about strategy as I said earlier but that would be too complicated as strategy cannot be measured in effectiveness and even if we did, we would have to calculate numbers and add in more factors to be more effective or not if both had confronted each other. At that point, players would give up and say it is too complicated.

So I don't consider that a flaw because it was my intention to be that way. But it is up to the admins to decide your place, but in consideration of tech as well.

Wars can be decided with good enough tech ik that, but all of that should go into power ranking. The tech gap is not a lot anyways

I understand about the numbers within the troops they sent tho, so I'll consider that, maybe we can discount power rank if the enemy sent troops less than double the nations that have higher tech (but that would lead to us needing to make a tech table. Which I dislike for making things more complicated, but if admins want to they can)

Unless you want me to help with the game by monitoring power ranks( and do lore)